PR Deal

Provides articles and information about the search engine optimization and marketing industry.

Sunday, July 23, 2006

Domain For Sale

USD10000 starting bid. BIN USD25000. Happy bidding. Thanks

>>> WWW.PRDEAL.COM <<<

Its either can be a PR for Page Rank, where SEO and fellow webmaster can gather and doing trading to increase their PR ranking or PR for Public relations where PR companies or organizations can have this domain as their portal to manage all their contact and clients.

Latest news:

1. This site got registered on 21 Julai and start receiving a lot of visitor


below is the visitor stats






the website are not recorded any earnings yet since no google adsense install, as this website is fully concentrated for sale.


2. The domain listed in TDNAM auction by Godaddy

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

https://www.tdnam.com/trpItemListing.aspx?miid=4267734&


3. The domain achieve no.1 result for the keyword "PR DEAL"

1 - 10 of about 51,200,000

p/s: you can always post your bid here or at the forum post, I am sorry no commenting on the domain/ no wrong bid all comment other than real bidding will be deleted, thank you.






| Submit To Netscape
WTS Link Blog Directory Submit Your Links Now!

Google stock trades sideways despite standout results

Google put up another quarter of eye-popping growth in revenues, profits and market share gains, but the stock traded sideways on Friday as the results contained few surprises to drive shares higher.

The Web search leader said Thursday that second-quarter net profit more than doubled, aided by a lower tax rate and a shift toward in-house advertising rather than through partners, as revenue grew 77 percent, in line with Wall Street forecasts.

In the absence of new reasons to pound the table on behalf of the stock, bullish Google analysts mostly rehearsed their arguments for why Google stock could still hit $450, $500 and even $600 over the next 12-months.

Google shares were up $1.38 to $388.50 in afternoon trading Friday. The stock is off 6 percent for the year to date.

"Everything was solid. But, obviously, for the first time, they didn't blow away their numbers," said Martin Pyykkonen, an analyst with brokerage Global Crown Capital of San Francisco.

"The momentum investors are going to look at Google and say 'We are at reality now. Why own the stock?'" Pyykkonen said.

More than 30 financial analysts raised their earnings estimates on Google in the wake of the report. Only two--BMO's Lee Westerfield and UBS's Benjamin Schachter--trimmed their outlook, according to Reuters Estimates data.

Google's results also showed it took further market share from rival Yahoo in the Web search market. Google, which derives virtually all its revenue from Web search advertising, enjoyed a 9 percent rise in revenue between March and June, while Yahoo grew 3 percent.

Pyykkonen calculates Yahoo's Web search ad business grew only 1.5 percent, meaning Google gained substantial share. Yahoo said this week it would further delay an upgraded system designed to attack Google's edge in Web search ads.

An earnings warning by Dell and fears of a computer chip price war that could damage Advanced Micro Devices also weighed on technology stocks.

Goldman Sachs said there's a 25 percent upside to Google's stock, highlighting the positive tone of management's comments that it expected to wring more money out of its advertising system even in the sluggish third-quarter season.

Stifel Nicolaus analyst Scott Devitt said in a note to clients that Google's earnings power remains underappreciated relative to that of its peers, even as its revenue grows more than twice as fast Yahoo's and eBay's.

Google's stock trades about 30 times Devitt's 2007 year earnings estimates, compared with the price-to-earnings multiples of Yahoo, at 25, and eBay, at about 20.

"We believe amongst Google, eBay and Yahoo, that it is most likely that Google's earnings power is the most underestimated of the three," Devitt wrote.

Piper Jaffray analyst Safa Rashtchy reiterated his $600 price target on Google but used his rising earnings expectations into 2007 as an opportunity to pare back his valuation assumptions to 46 times 2007 earnings from 50 times.

"We also believe that the lowered multiple is warranted given the increasingly large scale of the business," Rashtchy said, adding, "We would be active buyers of Google ahead of what typically is a much stronger second half."






| Submit To Netscape
WTS Link Blog Directory Submit Your Links Now!

Saturday, July 22, 2006

Blogger Help - Tips for blogspot Newbies

Blogger Help - Tips for blogspot Newbies maybe this site can help me hoe to see my number of post in my blogger.






| Submit To Netscape
WTS Link Blog Directory Submit Your Links Now!

Gadget gear is buzzing; but who's buying?

NEW YORK - Shoe and clothing makers are in a race to offer gadget-ready gear, from jackets with iPod controls to basketball sneakers that pump out digital music.

But, as with many consumer trends, the question of acceptance remains key for manufacturers: If we make it, will they buy?

Trendy geeks can already own jackets, backpacks and belts that allow them to adjust devices without touching them; shirts and ties that keep portable players out of sight; and running shoes that communicate via those familiar white ear buds.

There is even a whimsical line of baby clothes emblazoned with the Apple Computer iPod control wheel.

Gadget-geared apparel was pioneered by Burton Snowboards in 2002 and expanded by Spyder Skiwear and O'Neill, yet the market for it remains tiny, said NPD Group analyst Marshal Cohen.

But that is likely to change soon.

With household names like Nike, Levi Strauss & Co., and Columbia Sportswear coming on board, gadget goods may be going mainstream.

"It will likely become a billion-dollar business within the next two-and-a-half to three years," Cohen told Reuters. "You're talking about a very substantial piece of the pie."

This fall season will set the stage, as Columbia plans to release iPod-friendly jackets and Levi launches iPod jeans, replete with a joystick in the watch pocket.

Peter Boatwright, associate professor of marketing at Carnegie Mellon University's Tepper School of Business said integrating technology into shoes and jackets makes sense, and noted that large companies usually do a good deal of market research before developing new products.

"It's the onslaught of ties, jackets and speakers of various forms in the airline magazines, (that) are probably from companies trying to free-ride off the massive success of iPod and other devices," Boatwright said. "That's where we consumers get inundated and tired."

AT WHAT PRICE?

"Consumers are excited about the technology and the benefits of the product, but they're not going to put a major premium on obtaining that additional functionality," said Tom Krutilek, vice president of marketing for Kenpo Inc., a private company that makes jackets with iPod controls on the sleeves.

"The typical consumer has a certain budget in their mind, and if it's within that framework, fantastic. If it's not, then it doesn't work for the consumer," he said.

After trying to fetch $275 per jacket in test markets, Krutilek said Kenpo learned that $99 to $199 was a more appropriate price range at stores such as Federated Department Stores's Macy's and Dillard's.

After just a year, Krutilek claims the iPod jacket sales generated more than $2.5 million, or 5 to 10 percent of the company's total revenue.

Burton Snowboards, the private company which in 2002 sold a $999 jacket with a built-in mini-disc system, derives "a significant portion" of its outerwear revenue from jackets, bags, helmets and hats designed to make carrying gadgets more convenient, said vice president of global marketing, Bryan Johnston.

Johnston said Burton's gadget-ready items, priced from $299 to $649, have "exceeded our expectations."

CIRCLING THE TARGET

Johnston said snowboarders make up nearly three-quarters of those who have bought Burton's Audex jackets. With a speaker in the hood and Bluetooth Wireless technology, they allow the wearer to adjust music and answer a mobile phone by touching the jacket's exterior.

"As it becomes more commonplace those numbers will probably reverse in two or three years," Johnston said. "It's the old SUV maxim -- how many people really take their SUVs off-road?"

Dada footwear Chief Executive Lavetta Willis is betting on the same numbers shift as she prepares for the mid-August launch of the company's $200 basketball shoes embedded with a digital music player, with speakers at the ankle or a wireless headset.

"Right now, our initial target is 12- to 25-year-olds, but we look at people running down the street and it's all ages," Willis said in an interview with Reuters TV. "Everybody wants their music."

And 38-year-old Lanny Ball from Portland, Oregon, is proof that Johnston and Willis could be on the right track.

"I usually shop at thrift stores to avoid corporate retail," Ball said. "But it would be convenient to listen to music without having to worry about my iPod getting caught in the rain or catching it on something and pulling the cords out of my ears."






| Submit To Netscape
WTS Link Blog Directory Submit Your Links Now!

Friday, July 21, 2006

How to Submit Your Blog to the Top Search Engines

Although submitting your blog to the search engines is very similar to submitting your website, there are several differences that you should be aware of. Knowing these differences can help you get your blog indexed more quickly because you have submitted your blog correctly.

Regardless of whether you are submitting a blog or a website, if you are submitting to Google, you should create a sitemap. Although you should check your sitemap periodically to make sure Google isn't encountering any errors with your sitemap, once you submit it, you don't have to submit to Google again. All you have to do is keep your sitemap up to date.

If you use a blog like Wordpress, you can install the sitemap plugin. This plugin updates your sitemap automatically and notifies Google that your site has changed.

If you don't use a blogging software that generates sitemaps, you can create your own. Google offers plenty of free tools for creating sitemaps.

Even if you don't have a sitemap, you can still add your site to Google. You just won't get detailed statistics.

You can submit to Google here: https://www.google.com/webmasters/sitemaps/login

Since Google doesn't allow direct submission to its blog search, you will need to make sure that you submit your site to blog directories Google pulls results from for its blog search, and then make sure you ping these sites when you update your blog.

You can use sites like Feed Shot, http://www.feedshot.com, to submit your site to some of the major blog directories. Then you only need to ping your blog to update it at these directories.

When submitting to Yahoo, you need to submit your site feed instead of a sitemap. You can submit your blog to Yahoo here: http://submit.search.yahoo.com/free/request. Instead of submitting your site, you will use the first block and submit your feed.

You should also add your blog feed to your My Yahoo page. This can get your blog added faster and will get your blog included in Yahoo's version of blog search.

You will need an account to submit to both Yahoo and Google. It's free.

MSN, the third of the big three search engines is completely different in the way that you need to submit to get your blog included.

You can submit directly to MSN to be included. You don't need an account, but you will need to submit manually because you will need to enter the characters on the page to make sure your submission request goes through.

You can submit here: http://beta.search.msn.com/docs/submit.aspx

MSN also offers an alternative that will help you get your entire blog included in its site results. Submit your blog to Moreover, http://www.moreover.com. If your site is included in Moreover, it should be included in MSN as MSN draws a lot of results from this news site.

Once you've submitted your blog to the top three search engines, forget about it. Your next step should be to ping your blog each time that you post to it.

Before you ping your blog for the first time though, make sure that you glance through the list of blog directories. You want to make sure you have submitted your blog to each of the directories listed. Also, some of the ping sites listed may not relate to your blog. Make sure you uncheck these before you ping.

Ping Services
http://www.pingomatic.com
http://www.pingtheempire.com
http://www.pingoat.com

Ping your blog each time you update.

These techniques will help you get about 80 percent coverage in the search engines. Once you've taken this step in your promotion, move on. Write press releases and articles and submit them to press release and article directories. Build links.

Successfully promoting your blog or website depends on consistent promotion. Promote regularly, and you will see results.






| Submit To Netscape
WTS Link Blog Directory Submit Your Links Now!

Microsoft Develops Tool to Fight Web Spam

Spam messages have become a menace spreading it lethal wings from e-mails to invading message board. In an attempt to end this spam invasion Microsoft has launched a new project to seek out search engine spam. The tool developed by the company is aimed at preventing web spammers from exploiting Internet search engines to drive traffic to spam uniform resource locators (URLs).

Spammers target message board for the simple reason that Google and other search engines rank pages by the number of sites that link to them. If enough fake posts are made to pointing to the spam site, the pages may appear in the top page of results for legitimate searches.

The project by Microsoft Research is headed by Yi-Min Wang, group manager of the Cybersecurity and Systems Management Research Group in Microsoft Research, and focuses on a major problem now plaguing the Web: blog spam.

"They create a URL they want people to click and they put that into every possible open forum and guest book they can," Wang said. "Some search engines will see that this URL is everywhere on the Web so it should be popular. But it doesn't have the kind of relevance to be in the top search-engine results."

Strider Search Defender combines technology such as HoneyMonkey and Typo Patrol, previously developed by the company, to search forums that have been spammed and to identify spam URLs. The tool also has an element to differentiate between legitimate URLs on Web forums and spam URLs, Wang said.

The tool can also identify ‘doorway domain’, which is used by the spammers to set up a spam site so it looks like a valid Web site to fool users and search engines. The tool can identity the domain that is being exploited and alert its administrators.

"If they put [what looks like a] blog URL into your forum and everyone else’s, they will fool the search engine," Wang said.

Microsoft Research has released the details of the tool along with published information in its report to encourage owners of free Web-hosting sites, search engines and publicly accessible Web forums to do what they can to prevent Web spammers from exploiting search engines.

Wang said that Web-hosting sites can address the problem by shutting down sites that are still online but are no longer used or visited.






| Submit To Netscape
WTS Link Blog Directory Submit Your Links Now!

How Can Your Google Adwords Quality Score Reduce The Amount You Pay Per Click?

Google Adwords is an auction based Pay Per Click (PPC) advertising system where you as a PPC advertiser set the maximum amount you are happy to pay for each click you receive from your advertisement placed with Google.

As an Adwords advertiser you compete in a real-time auction every time a keyword triggers your ad. Adwords is a 'Vickery' type auction. In a Vickery auction once a winner has been decided, the actual price paid is not the maximum amount bid, it is one penny more than the bid of the second highest bidder. Google Adwords adds a twist to this, as winning bidders are also determined by Ad Rank, not by maximum bid.

An understanding of the way that Google Adwords ranks PPC bidders to determine who has won each of the real-time auctions is essential to establishing a consistent and profitable strategy when taking part in the Google Adwords PPC Programme.


The Google Adwords Quality Score

The Google Adwords system for determining who wins the PPC auction is based upon the belief that high quality ad creatives benefit all parties involved. When the ads that Google displays match the requirments of searchers the assertion is that this benefits advertisers, searchers, publishers and Google alike. They name this 'relevancy'.

Since the winning bidder gets the highest position and the highest position gets the most clicks, the goal for you as a Google advertiser is to get the highest position for your advert creative at the lowest possible cost per click (CPC)

Every time a search is prompted and an auction has taken place, Google ranks the triggered ads by 'Ad Rank'. The position of each ad is based upon its 'Ad Rank'.


Ad Rank = 'Maximum Cost Per Click' x 'Quality Score'


Since the 'Ad Rank' is not just the maximum amount that an advertiser has bid the highest bidder does not always win. The winning bid is based upon an additional set of elements, which together make up the Google Quality Score.

The Quality Score is the basis upon which Google assesses and measures the relevancy of your ad to users and has a major effect in deciding how much you actually pay per click. This means that to compete efficiently an Adwords advertiser must be aware of what they have to do to achieve a high Google quality score.

Exactly how Google calculates the Quality Score is unknown to us and is a closely guarded secret.

Google do tell us however that Quality Score is determined by a keyword's clickthrough rate (CTR), the relevance of text in the ad, the historical performance of that keyword and other relevancy factors including the landing page of the target url.


The Google Quality Score & Cost Per Click (CPC)

Typically the higher an ad's Quality Score, the more relevant it is for the keywords to which it is tied to. When ads are highly relevant to the searcher they tend to earn more clicks and as a result achieve a higher click-through rate (CTR). This tells Google that users are finding the ad relevant and clicking on it to find out more. A higher CTR will increase a keyword's Quality Score, which in turn increases the Ad Rank. As a PPC advertiser this means that you can maintain or increase your position whilst lowering the actual cost per click that you pay.

Furthermore Google stops displaying ads for keywords that have a low Quality Score. If an ad has a low Quality Score on a certain keyword it means that users are not finding that ad relevant to their needs and Google will disable the keyword by making it inactive.

A Practical Example Of How The Google Quality Score Works



The PPC bidding system that Google Adwords operates is a complicated one because we can never fully be sure of the Quality Score of competitive bids.



Making assumptions about the Google Quality Score, here is an example of how the Google Adwords system would decide who wins a PPC auction and how much they would pay per click.



I've used 5 PPC bidders to display how it works but in reality there will be many, many more bidders involved in each PPC auction.



The column titled 'Actual CPC' in the table below shows how much each Adwords bidder would pay for their click following that particular auction.




Quality Score Maximum CPC Ad Rank Actual CPC



Noddy 3 £0.55 1.7 £0.34

Big Ears 1 £1.00 1.0 £0.84

PC Plod 1 £0.80 0.8 £0.41

Bill 2 £0.20 0.4 £0.11

Ben 1 £0.20 0.2 £0.01


To calculate how much each PPC bidder pays, Google first calculates the Ad Rank for each bidder. The Ad Rank is Google's Quality Score multiplied by the Maximum CPC. In the table above we have ranked the ads by their Ad Rank and we can see that Noddy has won this PPC auction and his ad will be in top position in the search engine results.

Noddy was prepared to pay Google up to a maximum of £0.55 per click but he only needs to pay 1p more than would be necessary to keep his Ad Rank above the next highest ranked bidder - £0.34. The calculation is:

'Actual CPC' = 'Ad Rank of Next Highest Bidder' / 'Quality Score of Winning Bidder') + 1p



Which in our case is:

('Big Ears Ad Rank' / 'Noddy's Quality Score') + 1p


= £0.34p

The same logic is applied to each bidder in the list, Big Ears and PC Plod, then PC Plod and Bill, etc.

In the example above you can see that because Google is rewarding Noddy because his ad is relevant, he is actually paying much less per click than his competitors Big Ears and PC Plod.

Using this formula, if all other factors remained constant, Big Ears would have to pay a massive £1.66 per click if he wanted to move up to a postion above Noddy.

As you can see from this example any PPC advertiser that does not understand the concept of Quality Score runs the risk of paying heavily for their ignorance.






| Submit To Netscape
WTS Link Blog Directory Submit Your Links Now!

PageRank: Explained

PageRank is a patented method to assign a numerical weighting to each element of a hyperlinked set of documents, such as the World Wide Web, with the purpose of "measuring" its relative importance within the set. The algorithm may be applied to any collection of entities with reciprocal quotations and references. The numerical weight that it assigns to any given element E is also called the PageRank of E and denoted by PR(E).

PageRank was developed at Stanford University by Larry Page (hence the name Page-Rank [Vise and Malseed, 2005]) and Sergey Brin as part of a research project about a new kind of search engine. The project started in 1995 and led to a functional prototype, named Google, in 1998. Shortly after, Page and Brin founded Google Inc., the company behind the Google search engine, which still has PageRank as a key element.


PageRank uses links as "votes"

Google describes PageRank:

PageRank relies on the uniquely democratic nature of the web by using its vast link structure as an indicator of an individual page's value. In essence, Google interprets a link from page A to page B as a vote, by page A, for page B. But, Google looks at more than the sheer volume of votes, or links a page receives; it also analyzes the page that casts the vote. Votes cast by pages that are themselves "important" weigh more heavily and help to make other pages "important."

In other words, a PageRank results from a "ballot" among all the other pages on the World Wide Web about how important a page is. A hyperlink to a page counts as a vote of support. The PageRank of a page is defined recursively and depends on the number and PageRank metric of all pages that link to it ("incoming links"). A page that is linked to by many pages with high PageRank receives a high rank itself. If there are no links to a web page there is no support for that page.

Numerous academic papers concerning PageRank have been published since Page and Brin's original paper. In practice, the PageRank concept has proven to be vulnerable to manipulation, and extensive research has been devoted to identifying falsely inflated PageRank and ways to ignore links from documents with falsely inflated PageRank.

Important, high-quality sites receive a higher PageRank, which Google remembers each time it conducts a search. Of course, important pages mean nothing to you if they don't match your query. So, Google combines PageRank with sophisticated text-matching techniques to find pages that are both important and relevant to your search. Google goes far beyond the number of times a term appears on a page and examines all aspects of the page's content (and the content of the pages linking to it) to determine if it's a good match for your query.
[edit]

Google's "rel=nofollow" proposal

In early 2005, Google implemented a new value, "nofollow", for the rel attribute of HTML link and anchor elements, so that website builders and bloggers can make links that Google will not consider for the purposes of PageRank — they are links that no longer constitute a "vote" in the PageRank system. The nofollow relationship was added in an attempt to help combat spamdexing.
[edit]

Google toolbar PageRank

The Google Toolbar PageRank measures PageRank from 0 to 10. Many people assume that the Toolbar PageRank is a proxy value determined through a logarithmic scale. Google has not disclosed the precise method for determining a Toolbar PageRank value. Google representatives, such as engineer Matt Cutts, have publicly indicated that the Toolbar PageRank is republished about once every three months, indicating that the Toolbar PageRank values are generally unreliable measurements of actual PageRank value for most periods of the year.
[edit]

Google directory PageRank

The Google Directory PageRank is an 8-unit measurement. These values can be viewed in the Google Directory. Unlike the Google Toolbar which shows the PageRank value by a mouseover of the greenbar, the Google Directory doesn't show the PageRank values. You can only see the PageRank scale values by looking at the source and wading though the HTML code.

These eight positions are displayed next to each Website in the Google Directory. cleardot.gif is used for a zero value and a combination of two graphics pos.gif and neg.gif are used for the other 7 values. The pixel widths of the seven values are 5/35, 11/29, 16/24, 22/18, 27/13, 32/8 and 38/2 (pos.gif/neg.gif).
[edit]

"PageRank" as a trademark

The name PageRank is a trademark of Google. The PageRank process has been patented (U.S. Patent 6,285,999). The patent is not assigned to Google but to Stanford University.

Alternatives to the PageRank algorithm are the HITS algorithm proposed by Jon Kleinberg and the IBM CLEVER project. Many HITS concepts are now incorporated into Teoma and Ask.com.
[edit]

Some algorithm details

PageRank is a probability distribution used to represent the likelihood that a person randomly clicking on links will arrive at any particular page. PageRank can be calculated for any-size collection of documents. It is assumed in several research papers that the distribution is evenly divided between all documents in the collection at the beginning of the computational process. The PageRank computations require several passes, called "iterations", through the collection to adjust approximate PageRank values to more closely reflect the theoretical true value.

A probability is expressed as a numeric value between 0 and 1. A 0.5 probability is commonly expressed as a "50% chance" of something happening. Hence, a PageRank of 0.5 means there is a 50% chance that a person clicking on a random link will be directed to the document with the 0.5 PageRank.
[edit]

Simplified PageRank algorithm

Suppose a small universe of four web pages: A, B,C and D. The initial approximation of PageRank would be evenly divided between these four documents. Hence, each document would begin with an estimated PageRank of 0.25.

If pages B, C, and D each only link to A, they would each confer 0.25 PageRank to A. All PageRank in this simplistic system would thus gather to A because all links would be pointing to A.

PR(A)= PR(B) + PR(C) + PR(D).\,

But then suppose page B also has a link to page C, and page D has links to all three pages. The value of the link-votes is divided among all the outbound links on a page. Thus, page B gives a vote worth 0.125 to page A and a vote worth 0.125 to page C. Only one third of D's PageRank is counted for A's PageRank (approximately 0.081).

PR(A)= \frac{PR(B)}{2}+ \frac{PR(C)}{1}+ \frac{PR(D)}{3}.\,

In other words, the PageRank conferred by an outbound link is equal to the document's own PageRank score divided by the normalized number of outbound links (it is assumed that links to specific URLs only count once per document).

PR(A)= \frac{PR(B)}{L(B)}+ \frac{PR(C)}{L(C)}+ \frac{PR(D)}{L(D)}. \,

[edit]

PageRank algorithm including damping factor

The PageRank theory holds that even an imaginary surfer who is randomly clicking on links will eventually stop clicking. The probability, at any step, that the person will continue is a damping factor d. Various studies have tested different damping factors, but it is generally assumed that the damping factor will be set around 0.85.

The damping factor is subtracted from 1 (and in some variations of the algorithm, the result is divided by the number of documents in the collection) and this term is then added to the product of (the damping factor and the sum of the incoming PageRank scores).

That is,

PR(A)= 1 - d + d \left( \frac{PR(B)}{L(B)}+ \frac{PR(C)}{L(C)}+ \frac{PR(D)}{L(D)}+\,\cdots \right)

or (N = the number of documents in collection)

PR(A)= {1 - d \over N} + d \left( \frac{PR(B)}{L(B)}+ \frac{PR(C)}{L(C)}+ \frac{PR(D)}{L(D)}+\,\cdots \right) .

So any page's PageRank is derived in large part from the PageRanks of other pages. The damping factor adjusts the derived value downward. The second formula above supports the original statement in Page and Brin's paper that "the sum of all PageRanks is one". Unfortunately, however, Page and Brin gave the first formula, which has led to some confusion.

Google recalculates PageRank scores each time it crawls the Web and rebuilds its index. As Google increases the number of documents in its collection, the initial approximation of PageRank decreases for all documents.

The formula uses a model of a random surfer who gets bored after several clicks and switches to a random page. The PageRank value of a page reflects the chance that the random surfer will land on that page by clicking on a link. It can be understood as a Markov chain in which the states are pages, and the transitions are all equally probable and are the links between pages.

If a page has no links to other pages, it becomes a sink and therefore terminates the random surfing process. However, the solution is quite simple. If the random surfer arrives at a sink page, it picks another URL at random and continues surfing again.

When calculating PageRank, pages with no outbound links are assumed to link out to all other pages in the collection. Their PageRank scores are therefore divided evenly among all other pages. In other words, to be fair with pages that are not sinks, these random transitions are added to all nodes in the Web, with a residual probability of usually d = 0.85, estimated from the frequency that an average surfer uses his or her browser's bookmark feature.

So, the equation is as follows:

PR(p_i) = \frac{1-d}{N} + d \sum_{p_j \in M(p_i)} \frac{PR (p_j)}{L(p_j)}

where p1,p2,...,pN are the pages under consideration, M(pi) is the set of pages that link to pi, L(pj) is the number of links coming from page pj, and N is the total number of pages.

The PageRank values are the entries of the dominant eigenvector of the modified adjacency matrix. This makes PageRank a particularly elegant metric: the eigenvector is

\mathbf{R} = \begin{bmatrix} PR(p_1) \\ PR(p_2) \\ \vdots \\ PR(p_N) \end{bmatrix}

where R is the solution of the equation

\mathbf{R} = \begin{bmatrix} {(1-d)/ N} \\ {(1-d) / N} \\ \vdots \\ {(1-d) / N} \end{bmatrix} + d \begin{bmatrix} \ell(p_1,p_1) & \ell(p_1,p_2) & \cdots & \ell(p_1,p_N) \\ \ell(p_2,p_1) & \ddots & & \\ \vdots & & \ell(p_i,p_j) & \\ \ell(p_N,p_1) & & & \ell(p_N,p_N) \end{bmatrix} \mathbf{R}

where the adjacency function \ell(p_i,p_j) is 0 if page pj does not link to pi, and normalised such that, for each j

\sum_{i = 1}^N \ell(p_i,p_j) = 1,

i.e. the elements of each column sum up to 1.

This is a variant of the eigenvector centrality measure used commonly in network analysis.

The values of the PageRank eigenvector are fast to approximate (only a few iterations are needed) and in practice it gives good results.

As a result of Markov theory, it can be shown that the PageRank of a page is the probability of being at that page after lots of clicks. This happens to equal t − 1 where t is the expectation of the number of clicks (or random jumps) required to get from the page back to itself.

The main disadvantage is that it favors older pages, because a new page, even a very good one, will not have many links unless it is part of an existing site (a site being a densely connected set of pages). The Google Directory (itself a derivative of the Open Directory Project) is an exception in which PageRank is not used to determine search results rankings.

Several strategies have been proposed to accelerate the computation of PageRank.

Various strategies to manipulate PageRank have been employed in concerted efforts to improve search results rankings and monetize advertising links. These strategies have severely impacted the reliability of the PageRank concept, which seeks to determine which documents are actually highly valued by the Web community.

Google is known to actively penalize link farms and other schemes designed to artificially inflate PageRank. How Google identifies link farms and other PageRank manipulation tools are among Google's trade secrets.
[edit]

False or spoofed PageRank

While the PR shown in the Toolbar is considered to be accurate (at the time of publication by Google) for most sites, it must be noted that this value is also easily manipulated. A current flaw is that any low PageRank page that is redirected, via a 302 server header or a "Refresh" meta tag, to a high PR page causes the lower PR page to acquire the PR of the destination page. In theory a new, PR0 page with no incoming links can be redirected to the Google home page - which is a PR 10 - and by the next PageRank update the PR of the new page will be upgraded to a PR10. This is called spoofing and is a known failing or bug in the system. Any page's PR can be spoofed to a higher or lower number of the webmaster's choice and only Google has access to the real PR of the page. Spoofing is generally detected by running a Google search for a URL with questionable PR, as the results will display the URL of an entirely different site (the one redirected to) in its results.

Google's home page is often considered to be automatically rated a 10/10 by the Google Toolbar's PageRank feature, but its PageRank has at times shown a surprising result of only 8/10 (which is lower than other, very few, web pages that are not related to Google) and it seems that this rating was achieved through the PageRank algorithm, and wasn't programmed into the toolbar by Google as constant.
[edit]

Buying text links

For search-engine optimization purposes, webmasters often buy links for their sites. As links from higher-PR pages are believed to be more valuable, they tend to be more expensive. It can be an effective and viable marketing strategy to buy link advertisements on content pages of quality and relevant sites to drive traffic and increase a webmaster's link popularity. However, Google has publicly warned webmasters that if they are or were discovered to be selling links for the purpose of conferring PageRank and reputation, their links will be devalued (ignored in the calculation of other pages' PageRanks). The practice of buying and selling links is intensely debated across the Webmastering community. Google officially advises that users should place rel="nofollow" on such purchased links.
[edit]

Other uses of PageRank

A version of PageRank has recently been proposed as a replacement for the traditional ISI impact factor. Instead of merely counting citations of a journal, the "quality" of a citation is determined in a PageRank fashion.

A Web crawler may use Pagerank as one of a number of importance metrics it uses to determine which URL to visit next during a crawl of the web. One of the early working papers which was used in the creation of Google is Efficient crawling through URL ordering, which discusses the use of a number of different importance metrics to determine how deeply, and how much of a site Google will crawl. Pagerank is presented as one of a number of these importance metrics, though there are others listed such as the number of inbound and outbound links for a URL, and the distance from the root directory on a site to the URL.
[edit]

PageRank and search engine results

PageRank is just one factor, amongst more than 100, used to calculate the rank of a page in results of searches.
[edit]

References

* Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page (1998). "The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine". Proceedings of the seventh international conference on World Wide Web 7, 107-117.

* Lawrence Page, Sergey Brin, Rajeev Motwani, and Terry Winograd (1999). "The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the Web".

* Matthew Richardson and Pedro Domingos (2002). "The intelligent surfer: Probabilistic combination of link and content information in PageRank". Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.

* David Vise and Mark Malseed (2005). The Google Story, 37.

* Cho, J., Garcia-Molina, H., and Page, L. (1998). "Efficient crawling through URL ordering". Proceedings of the seventh conference on World Wide Web.

* Working Papers Concerning the Creation of Google. Google. Retrieved on June 30, 2006.

[edit]

See also

* PigeonRank
* TrustRank
* Power method — the iterative eigenvector algorithm used to calculate PageRank
* PR0
* Google bomb

[edit]

External links

* Our Search: Google Technology by Google
* Original Pagerank U.S. Patent- Method for node ranking in a linked database - September 4, 2001
* Pagerank U.S. Patent - Method for scoring documents in a linked database - September 28, 2004
* Pagerank U.S. Patent - Method for node ranking in a linked database - June 6, 2006
* The mathematics behind the PageRank algorithm
* PageRank Check, Calculators and other Google tools at the Open Directory Project

Google Inc.[ Hide ]

Services and tools

Search Services: Blogs | Books | Catalogs | Directory | Froogle | Groups | Images | News | Personalized Search | Scholar | Video | Web

Web Applications: Analytics | Base | Blogger | Calendar | Finance | Gmail | Google Checkout | Maps | orkut | Personalized Homepage | Picasa Web Albums | Translate | Writely

Computer Applications: Browser Sync | Desktop | Earth | Hello | Pack | Picasa | SketchUp | Talk | Toolbar

Miscellaneous: AdSense | AdWords | Answers | Labs | Mobile | Sitemaps | SMS | Trends | Zeitgeist

Other
Terminology and concepts: Google economy | Google (verb) | Google bomb | Google juice
History and criticism: Google logo | Google and privacy issues | History of Google | Google's hoaxes
See also: Google Founders' Award | Googleplex | List of acquisitions by Google | PageRank

Annual Revenue: $7.14 billion USD (2006) | Employees: 6,800 (2006) | Stock Symbol: NASDAQ GOOG | Website: www.google.com


Categories: Google | Search engine optimization | Reputation management






| Submit To Netscape
WTS Link Blog Directory Submit Your Links Now!

Hello World

This is my first post on my first blog domain






| Submit To Netscape
WTS Link Blog Directory Submit Your Links Now!